Analýza zkoumá souvislost mezi kvalitou časopisu a kvalitou hodnocení v oblasti bezpečnosti silničního provozu. Výsledky ukazují, že kvalitnější časopisy často publikují kvalitnější studie, což je důležité pro autory, čtenáře i meta-analytiky.
Abstrakt
Meta-analyses are an important source of road safety evidence. However, their source data may be biased by both evaluation quality and journal quality. This motivated us to explore the link, focusing on the effectiveness of physical road safety measures. We collected and combined two kinds of datasets: evaluation quality of research (seven samples) and journal quality (eight ranking lists). In the end, only the CMF Clearinghouse dataset of more than 1000 evaluations could be used. Despite some inconsistencies, six of eight rankings showed the expected positive relationship: the better journal ranking, the better evaluation ranking (and vice versa). This calls for the attention of authors and readers, as well as meta-analysts, particularly in the context of predatory journals and their potential impacts on the quality of road safety meta-analyses.
Citace
Jiří Ambros, Mariusz Kieć, Is there a link between journal quality and evaluation quality in road safety research?, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Volume 36, 2026, 101813, ISSN 2590-1982. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101813